go.mod: update PD client for pd#10997

[lhy1024]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref tikv/pd#10997

Problem Summary:

Successful Resource Control token waits can produce excessive TiDB warning logs.

What changed and how does it work?

• Update the PD client to v0.0.0-20260714045825-19ee324ee9d8, which includes [release-nextgen-202603] client: remove successful token wait logs tikv/pd#10997.
• Update kvproto to v0.0.0-20260703015547-e800f9e5a427, required by the PD client affinity backport.
• Regenerate Bazel dependency metadata.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
  • go test ./pkg/domain/affinity -tags=intest,deadlock,nextgen -count=1
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • make bazel_prepare
  • go mod verify
  • bazel build --remote_cache=https://cache.hawkingrei.com/bazelcache --noremote_upload_local_results //pkg/domain/affinity:affinity was attempted, but the new PD client and kvproto archives have not reached the configured TiDB mirrors yet (404/502).
• Integration test
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Reduce excessive TiDB warning logs for successful Resource Control token waits.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated internal dependency versions for improved compatibility and access to the latest upstream changes.
  • Synchronized dependency metadata and integrity checks with the updated versions.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

An error occurred during the review process. Please try again later.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[ti-chi-bot]

@bufferflies: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[dillon-zheng]

/retest

[lhy1024]

/retest

[lhy1024]

@cfzjywxk PTAL

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bufferflies, cfzjywxk, JmPotato

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [JmPotato,cfzjywxk]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2026-07-14 06:09:42.15739795 +0000 UTC m=+693968.193492996: ☑️ agreed by JmPotato.
• 2026-07-14 07:35:01.87832451 +0000 UTC m=+699087.914419576: ☑️ agreed by cfzjywxk.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (release-nextgen-202603@c89f0c7). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                     Coverage Diff                     @@
##             release-nextgen-202603     #69837   +/-   ##
===========================================================
  Coverage                          ?   76.1578%           
===========================================================
  Files                             ?       1936           
  Lines                             ?     540873           
  Branches                          ?          0           
===========================================================
  Hits                              ?     411917           
  Misses                            ?     128956           
  Partials                          ?          0           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	76.1578% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	61.5065% <0.0000%> (?)
parser	∅ <0.0000%> (?)
br	48.7600% <0.0000%> (?)

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.