Skip to content

docs(dev): add Step 0 to release process runbook#589

Merged
utensil merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
docs/release-process-step0
Apr 4, 2026
Merged

docs(dev): add Step 0 to release process runbook#589
utensil merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
docs/release-process-step0

Conversation

@utensil
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@utensil utensil commented Apr 3, 2026

Adds Step 0 to doc/dev/release-process.md: open a release issue before preparing the changelog or branching.

Captures the convention introduced in the 0.6.1 cycle (see #588). The issue should explain why we are cutting the release now, summarize what is in it (including any motivation or backstory), and list unusual pre-release todos. Routine steps are already covered by the runbook.

Captures the convention introduced in the 0.6.1 cycle: before preparing
the changelog or branching, open a GitHub issue to coordinate the release,
explain why we are cutting it now, and list any unusual pre-release todos.
Routine steps are already covered by this runbook and need not be repeated.
@utensil utensil added this to the 0.6.1 milestone Apr 3, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.67%. Comparing base (218b79a) to head (8743720).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #589   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.67%   73.67%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines        4483     4483           
=======================================
  Hits         3303     3303           
  Misses       1180     1180           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@utensil utensil merged commit 336ba2b into master Apr 4, 2026
10 checks passed
utiberious added a commit to utiberious/galgebra that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2026
… update release date

Adds changelog entries for three PRs merged after the initial 0.6.1
changelog write (pygae#583):

- pygae#590 / pygae#576: SymPy 1.13 TR3 performance workaround in curvi_linear_latex
- pygae#589 / pygae#588: Step 0 added to release-process runbook
- pygae#587 / pygae#586: pyproject.toml migration (PEP 517/621)

Also updates the 0.6.1 release date from 2026.04.02 to 2026.04.04
(actual merge date of the last included PR).

Addresses the changelog TODOs listed in release issue pygae#588.
utensil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2026
…se date

* docs(changelog): add 0.6.1 entries for #587, #589, #590; update release date

Adds changelog entries for three PRs merged after the initial 0.6.1
changelog write (#583):

- #590 / #576: SymPy 1.13 TR3 performance workaround in curvi_linear_latex
- #589 / #588: Step 0 added to release-process runbook
- #587 / #586: pyproject.toml migration (PEP 517/621)

Also updates the 0.6.1 release date from 2026.04.02 to 2026.04.04
(actual merge date of the last included PR).

Addresses the changelog TODOs listed in release issue #588.

* docs(changelog): expand 0.6.1 entries for #570, #572, #585

- #570: add ZeroDivisionError fix in Mv._latex, validate_nb_refresh.py,
  bumping-sympy.md guide, sympy pin bump, and issue #566 reference
- #572: remove bumping-sympy.md (belongs to #570, not #572)
- #585: add missing entry for is_blade test expansion

* docs(changelog): address review — fix tag, ordering, and 570 ZDE split

- #590: :support: → 🐛 (restores broken CI, not just a workaround)
- #585: move to correct descending-number position (between #587 and #580)
- #570: split ZeroDivisionError fix into separate 🐛`570` entry so it
  leads clearly; :support:`570` retains notebook refresh / tooling content
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant