Skip to content

Track known pyxle check gaps and their resolutions#7

Closed
shivamsn97 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/issue-review-mock-16590378851463784290
Closed

Track known pyxle check gaps and their resolutions#7
shivamsn97 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/issue-review-mock-16590378851463784290

Conversation

@shivamsn97

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Reviewed codebase, verified a bug in jsx_parser.py path resolution (_js_bases lacking pip site-packages check), created issue draft issue_1.md. Verified recent PR #6 merged via log, and simulated closing corresponding issues in old_issue_updates.md. No framework code modified as per instructions.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16590378851463784290 started by @shivamsn97

Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@shivamsn97 shivamsn97 changed the title chore: draft issues and document resolutions for Pyxle check Track known pyxle check gaps and their resolutions Jul 7, 2026
@shivamsn97

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

The extractor path-resolution issue tracked here is fixed properly in #10 (the JS extractor is now located via importlib with path fallbacks). Closing — the draft-note files aren't intended for the repo tree.

@shivamsn97 shivamsn97 closed this Jul 7, 2026
@shivamsn97 shivamsn97 deleted the chore/issue-review-mock-16590378851463784290 branch July 7, 2026 13:14
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The extractor path-resolution issue tracked here is fixed properly in #10 (the JS extractor is now located via importlib with path fallbacks). Closing — the draft-note files aren't intended for the repo tree.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task. I will remove the draft files.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant