Track known pyxle check gaps and their resolutions#7
Conversation
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
The extractor path-resolution issue tracked here is fixed properly in #10 (the JS extractor is now located via importlib with path fallbacks). Closing — the draft-note files aren't intended for the repo tree. |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task. I will remove the draft files. |
Reviewed codebase, verified a bug in
jsx_parser.pypath resolution (_js_baseslacking pipsite-packagescheck), created issue draftissue_1.md. Verified recent PR #6 merged via log, and simulated closing corresponding issues inold_issue_updates.md. No framework code modified as per instructions.PR created automatically by Jules for task 16590378851463784290 started by @shivamsn97