Skip to content

Comparative statics#11

Open
rafaelsuchy wants to merge 52 commits into
masterfrom
comparative_statics
Open

Comparative statics#11
rafaelsuchy wants to merge 52 commits into
masterfrom
comparative_statics

Conversation

@rafaelsuchy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@rafaelsuchy rafaelsuchy commented Jul 12, 2020

Set-up for comparative static analysis with example notebooks for KW94 and KW97 frameworks. The PR introduces

  • simulation of models under ambiguity and tuition subsidies
  • analysis of changes in experience, occupation shares etc. wrt. various ambiguity levels
  • scripts for partial automatisation (simulation)

rafaelsuchy added 30 commits June 4, 2020 01:01
@rafaelsuchy
Script for kernel analysis.
66f4981
@rafaelsuchy
Sample data kw94 for _full_solution.
3a79654
@rafaelsuchy
Ignore error 402: top-level imports.
dd82d03
@rafaelsuchy
Remove kernel analysis scripts.
269698d
@rafaelsuchy
Added timing threads scripts.
8adc1e9
@rafaelsuchy
Added timing processes scripts.
03795a7
@rafaelsuchy
Added input data for timing analysis.
49bf42b
@rafaelsuchy
Added sample output.
f381824
@rafaelsuchy
Adjustment flake8 ignorances.
059ab14
@rafaelsuchy
Rewritten with configuration file.
6bd9539
@rafaelsuchy
Rewritten with configuration file.
785ddcf
@rafaelsuchy
Rewritten processes to include configurations.
4ea4c19
@rafaelsuchy
Added configuration file.
e489fba
@rafaelsuchy
Rewritten scalability scripts to accommodate dataframe structure.
7b15c90
@rafaelsuchy
Added assembled raw data from KW simulate(params).
4800361
@rafaelsuchy
Simplified calling function
848ecf7
@rafaelsuchy
Refactoring execution time threads files.
5a6103f
@rafaelsuchy
Refactoring calling function scalability.
a53dc13
@rafaelsuchy
Deleted plotting module for specific threads.
30a6cb2
@rafaelsuchy
Added versatile plotting module.
0f4af49
@rafaelsuchy
Refactored for single data initialization.
0a4cdb1
@rafaelsuchy
Refactored process timing for DataFrame structure.
29beec0
@rafaelsuchy
Improvement data parsing.
78cb7e8
@rafaelsuchy
Consolidated plotting function(s).
08f2ff9
@rafaelsuchy
Removed consolidated plotting module.
3b2f264
@rafaelsuchy
Refactored execution moule - combined threads and process call.
6a8de7b
@rafaelsuchy
Added module that combined thread and process analysis.
51f6a1b
@rafaelsuchy
Summarized plotting to threads and processes.
aad688a
@rafaelsuchy
Renaming saved figures.
a7f28ea
@rafaelsuchy
Added command line change possibility.
6346dd8
rafaelsuchy added 18 commits June 8, 2020 22:59
@rafaelsuchy
Explicit period referencing.
2e72f32
@rafaelsuchy
Referencing period.
a3264dd
@rafaelsuchy
Cleanup and modification of computation time analysis.
dee3b59
@rafaelsuchy
Deleted wrong inpupt data.
e7efc77
@rafaelsuchy
Separated Input Data.
35f6f71
@rafaelsuchy
Added example notebook for data transformation.
683ba45
@rafaelsuchy
Added preliminary scalability report.
46eced0
@rafaelsuchy
Adjusted data format to pickle-only.
5de8732
@rafaelsuchy
Refactored notebook for tutorial to account for different data formats.
3727236
@rafaelsuchy
Refactored to account for pickle-only data.
49f24c2
@rafaelsuchy
Correction flake8 issue.
9e6f890
@rafaelsuchy
Manual reformatting.
d60e0d2
@rafaelsuchy
Manual formatting notebook (2nd).
09603c3
@rafaelsuchy
Notebook and script for comparative statics analysis
d5031ca
@rafaelsuchy
Raw data for comparative statics
3586fc7
@rafaelsuchy
Added simulation framework for comparative statics analysis
f6cc6ed
@rafaelsuchy
Script for model simulation
7b6c48e
@rafaelsuchy
Added analysis framework and notebooks
0e6cdc8
@review-notebook-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

review-notebook-app Bot commented Jul 12, 2020

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

Review Jupyter notebook visual diffs & provide feedback on notebooks.

Powered by ReviewNB

@rafaelsuchy rafaelsuchy requested review from peisenha and removed request for peisenha July 16, 2020 11:27
peisenha
peisenha approved these changes Jul 16, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@peisenha peisenha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@peisenha peisenha peisenha approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rafaelsuchy @peisenha