-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
Fix UTC handling for TimeStamp column with ConvertToUtc=true #660
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
marcominerva
wants to merge
1
commit into
serilog-mssql:dev
Choose a base branch
from
marcominerva:logevent-utc-timestamp
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+24
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did this change really affect the timestamp value in the LogEvent output? IIRC the method is only used when rendering the TimeStamp column. LogEvent is rendered separately.
Anyway, if you make this change you would convert the value written to the TimeStamp column to UTC even if the column has a data type which does not store the timezone information. We deliberately only enabled this if the data type of the column is SqlDbType.DateTimeOffset when first adding ConvertToUtc. This does not mean, that we cannot change it to be that way. Let me think about it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it works because in this way the
Timestampis returned asDateTimewithDateTimeKind.Utc, so when serialized to JSON it will be rendered with the Z modifier.If the
Timestampproperty in theLogEventJSON lacks the Z modifier whenconvertToUtc=true, the deserialized value will haveDateTimeKind.Unspecified, which may lead to unexpected behavior. UsingDateTimeKind.Utcensures consistent behavior.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you tested it? Give me some time, so I can try it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you tested it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I have added an explicit test to verify this new behavior, and I have also created a sample project with a project reference to the modified package to ensure that it really works “in the field”.
No problem, we’re not in a hurry—take all the time you need. Thank you for your support!