FAQ: update ldd information - #61
Conversation
according to what was recently discussed in `#musl`.
ericonr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't like this suggestion... A script that like is prone to invoking whatever is in the interpreter field... I think recommending that the script contain /lib/ld-musl... --list for your arch is more correct.
|
Co-authored-by: Érico Nogueira Rolim <34201958+ericonr@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Érico Nogueira Rolim <34201958+ericonr@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Yes, i disagree with dalias's suggestion. It only matters for a multilib/multiarch system, and even then, I'd rather be told that a given binary is not what I expected. It opens up too much for little gain. |
|
Also I think squashing the commits would be nice. |
certainly. i was just about to hit the "squash and merge" button, but to my surprise it isn't enabled for this repo. do you have admin rights to change that ? |
|
|
I don't think I have the privileges, no. Squashing locally with git leads to a cleaner commit message too... |
|
And rebase makes for a more linear git history, which is all this really needs. |
according to what was recently discussed in
#musl.