Skip to content

Conversation

@ahatanaka
Copy link

  • It exposes several failures to internal projects.

Revert "[C23] AST equivalence of attributes (llvm#151196)"

This reverts commit 30a5d56.

Revert "[C23] More improved type compatibility for enumerations (llvm#150946)"

This reverts commit d2361e4.

Revert "[C23] Handle type compatibility for enumerations better (llvm#150282)"

This reverts commit 315e2e2.

Revert "[C23] Handle type compatibility of unnamed records (llvm#141783)"

This reverts commit 6769a83.

Revert "Remove unused function; NFC"

This reverts commit ee3610e.

Revert "[C23] Implement WG14 N3037 (llvm#132939)"

This reverts commit a4ceac7.

* It exposes several failures to internal projects.

Revert "[C23] AST equivalence of attributes (llvm#151196)"

This reverts commit 30a5d56.

Revert "[C23] More improved type compatibility for enumerations (llvm#150946)"

This reverts commit d2361e4.

Revert "[C23] Handle type compatibility for enumerations better (llvm#150282)"

This reverts commit 315e2e2.

Revert "[C23] Handle type compatibility of unnamed records (llvm#141783)"

This reverts commit 6769a83.

Revert "Remove unused function; NFC"

This reverts commit ee3610e.

Revert "[C23] Implement WG14 N3037 (llvm#132939)"

This reverts commit a4ceac7.
@ahatanaka ahatanaka requested a review from a team as a code owner December 17, 2025 18:35
@ahatanaka
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test

@ahatanaka
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test Windows

@cyndyishida
Copy link

Thank you Akira!!

@ahatanaka
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test Windows

1 similar comment
@ahatanaka
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test Windows

@cyndyishida cyndyishida merged commit edf2964 into swift/release/6.3 Dec 19, 2025
3 checks passed
@cyndyishida cyndyishida deleted the revert-struct-equivalence branch December 19, 2025 18:17
@cyndyishida
Copy link

I think this revert introduced test failures to check-clang, will work on those independently but it would be good to also run @swift-ci please test LLVM too in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants