Fixed passing -0 to tail. Closes #10191

[trypsynth]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[cakebaker]

Can you please add a test to ensure we don't regress in the future? Thanks.

[trypsynth]

@cakebaker all done

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 6.21%

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 278 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 38 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Memory	du_deep_tree[(100, 3)]	155.8 KB	164.4 KB	-5.23%
❌	Memory	du_wide_tree[(5000, 500)]	1.2 MB	1.3 MB	-6.21%
⚡	Memory	numfmt_large_numbers_si[10000]	4.9 MB	4.7 MB	+4.01%
⚡	Memory	dd_copy_partial	133.5 KB	129.1 KB	+3.4%

---

_{Comparing trypsynth:tail-zero (1894e43) with main (5fd3459)}

Footnotes

1. 38 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[ChrisDryden]

Could this be an integration test in test_tail.rs? I think it would be more ideal to make sure the behaviour with that specific command doesn't regress, also would have less boilerplate to set up the test conditions