Skip to content

docs: publish DataFusion 55.0.0 and 55.1.0 snapshots - #2

Closed
yiaany wants to merge 67 commits into
asf-sitefrom
docs/publish-55-docs
Closed

yiaany wants to merge 67 commits into
asf-sitefrom
docs/publish-55-docs

Conversation

@yiaany

@yiaany yiaany commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary\n\nThis publication PR adds complete generated documentation snapshots under:\n\n- �ersions/55.0.0/ from tag 55.0.0\n- �ersions/55.1.0/ from tag 55.1.0\n\nBoth snapshots were built from their exact release tags with the existing docs/build.sh and the small versioned-docs configuration overlay from PR apache#24792. The generated pages use version-prefixed canonical URLs and include the version switcher.\n\nThe snapshots were checked locally over HTTP, including version switching, missing-page fallback, search, static assets, and both release roots. No .buildinfo file was published.\n\nThis targets the fork's �sf-site branch so the layout can be reviewed before publication to Apache's �sf-site.

@ecc-tools

ecc-tools Bot commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ECC Tools / Security Evidence

Commit: 04c8f683cf9e3f838ad34f71c788275c118b6d33

Security evidence gate passed (success)

No security-sensitive scanner-evidence gap detected.

Mode: enforce

Scanned 522 changed file(s). No missing scanner-evidence signal was detected.

Check publication was denied or unavailable. An app owner must enable Checks: read and write, and the installation owner must approve the updated permission.

@ecc-tools

ecc-tools Bot commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ECC Tools / PR Risk Taxonomy

Commit: 04c8f683cf9e3f838ad34f71c788275c118b6d33

PR taxonomy review recommended (neutral)

Detected 3 PR taxonomy bucket(s): CI/CD Recommendation, Cost/Token Risk, PR Review/Salvage Evidence.

Scanned 522 changed file(s).

Roadmap taxonomy buckets:

CI/CD Recommendation

CI, dependency, coverage, and contract signals should be routed into follow-up checks or verification work.

Signals:

  • Regression coverage may lag behind the diff
  • User-facing UI changes may ship without browser coverage
  • CLI changes may ship without shell or end-to-end coverage
  • 0 CI or workflow path(s) changed

Paths:

  • .asf.yaml
  • searchindex.js
  • versions/55.0.0/_static/base-stemmer.js
  • versions/55.0.0/_static/doctools.js
  • versions/55.0.0/_static/documentation_options.js
  • versions/55.0.0/_static/english-stemmer.js
  • versions/55.0.0/_static/language_data.js
  • versions/55.0.0/_static/scripts/bootstrap.js

Cost/Token Risk

AI routing, usage, and token-budget changes should include budget or usage-limit evidence.

Signals:

  • Cost or token-risk changes may ship without budget evidence
  • 0 cost/token path(s) changed

Paths:

  • .asf.yaml
  • _downloads/1e336e540124589d1e27210fa4f805f6/rust_lint.sh
  • _sources/contributor-guide/api-health.md.txt

PR Review/Salvage Evidence

PR review, stale-closure, and triage automation should carry stale-closure, reviewer-thread, and reopen-flow evidence so useful closed work can still be salvaged.

Signals:

  • PR review or stale-closure automation may ship without salvage evidence
  • 6 PR review/salvage path(s) changed

Paths:

  • _sources/contributor-guide/pr_review.md.txt
  • contributor-guide/pr_review.html
  • versions/55.0.0/_sources/contributor-guide/pr_review.md.txt
  • versions/55.0.0/contributor-guide/pr_review.html
  • versions/55.1.0/_sources/contributor-guide/pr_review.md.txt
  • versions/55.1.0/contributor-guide/pr_review.html

Check publication was denied or unavailable. An app owner must enable Checks: read and write, and the installation owner must approve the updated permission.

@ecc-tools

ecc-tools Bot commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ECC Tools / Reference Set Readiness

Commit: 04c8f683cf9e3f838ad34f71c788275c118b6d33

Reference set readiness gaps detected (neutral)

Reference evidence present for 0/7 areas (0%) across 522 changed file(s).

This check is based on files changed in this PR. Repository-level readiness is still reported by /ecc-tools analyze comments and generated manifests.

Area Status Evidence / Next Step
Deep analyzer corpus Missing Add analyzer fixture, golden, benchmark, or reference-set files that can catch analyzer regressions.
RAG/evaluator comparison Missing Add retrieval or evaluator reference-set comparison fixtures with expected ranking behavior.
PR salvage/review corpus Missing Add stale-PR, review-thread, reopen-flow, or salvage reference cases for queue cleanup automation.
Discussion triage corpus Missing Add public discussion triage fixtures, golden cases, or reference sets for informational, answered, and no-response classifications.
Harness compatibility Missing Add cross-harness, adapter-compliance, or harness-audit evidence for Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Zed, dmux, and agent surfaces.
Security evidence Missing Attach security evidence such as SBOMs, SARIF, audit reports, or AgentShield evidence packs.
CI failure-mode evidence Missing Add captured CI failure logs, dry-run fixtures, or troubleshooting docs for common workflow failure modes.

Check publication was denied or unavailable. An app owner must enable Checks: read and write, and the installation owner must approve the updated permission.

@ecc-tools

ecc-tools Bot commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ECC Tools / Hosted Promotion Readiness

Commit: 04c8f683cf9e3f838ad34f71c788275c118b6d33

Hosted promotion readiness passed (success)

No hosted promotion evidence gaps detected across 522 changed file(s); 0 corpus scenarios had matching evidence.

This check compares PR file changes against the evaluator/RAG promotion corpus in src/analyzers/fixtures/evaluator-rag-corpus.ts.
Hosted output scoring inspected 0 completed cached hosted job results.

No evaluator corpus scenarios matched this PR.

Check publication was denied or unavailable. An app owner must enable Checks: read and write, and the installation owner must approve the updated permission.

@yiaany

yiaany commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Closing this publication PR because it was based on the Apache asf-site branch while the PR base was the fork's stale asf-site branch. I am recreating it from the correct fork base so the review contains only the two versions/ snapshot directories and one publication commit.

@yiaany yiaany closed this Sep 29, 2026
@yiaany
yiaany deleted the docs/publish-55-docs branch September 29, 2026 17:25
@yiaany
yiaany restored the docs/publish-55-docs branch September 29, 2026 17:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant