Skip to content

Conversation

@ePaul
Copy link
Member

@ePaul ePaul commented Apr 15, 2025

RFCs 7231 (HTTP 1.1 Semantics) and 7235 (HTTP 1.1: Authentication) were both replaced by RFC 9119 (HTTP Semantics).

The draft for 451 is now RFC 7725, but I don't see a point linking to it, as we are not using it.

Fixes #828.

RFCs 7231 (HTTP 1.1 Semantics) and 7235 (HTTP 1.1: Authentication) were both
replaced by RFC 9119 (HTTP Semantics).

The draft for 451 is now RFC 7725, but I don't see a point linking to it, as we are not using it.
@ePaul ePaul added editorial bugfix Bug fixes and patches, e.g. fixing of a production issue that is affecting the customer experience. labels Apr 15, 2025
@zalando-compr-opensource
Copy link

invalid team ID

The team ID in your .zappr.yaml file does not appear to be valid. Please, fix
this before team ID checks will be added back into ComPR's specification check.

You can follow this guideline for help.

2 similar comments
@zalando-compr-opensource
Copy link

invalid team ID

The team ID in your .zappr.yaml file does not appear to be valid. Please, fix
this before team ID checks will be added back into ComPR's specification check.

You can follow this guideline for help.

@zalando-compr-opensource
Copy link

invalid team ID

The team ID in your .zappr.yaml file does not appear to be valid. Please, fix
this before team ID checks will be added back into ComPR's specification check.

You can follow this guideline for help.

@tfrauenstein
Copy link
Member

👍

@ePaul
Copy link
Member Author

ePaul commented Apr 15, 2025

👍

@ePaul ePaul merged commit acf0dc5 into main Apr 15, 2025
4 checks passed
@ePaul ePaul deleted the update-to-newer-rfcs branch April 15, 2025 14:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugfix Bug fixes and patches, e.g. fixing of a production issue that is affecting the customer experience. editorial no-zally-change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Is this rendering intentional? Link looks broken

3 participants