Skip to content

ci(nix): only run Nix CI on flake and packaging changes #1250

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
davidbudnick wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

ci(nix): only run Nix CI on flake and packaging changes #1250

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
13 changes: 4 additions & 9 deletions .github/workflows/nix.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
name: Nix CI

# Evaluate every advertised Flake output, then build and test the package on
# both supported Linux architectures. Dependency graph and packaging changes
# run immediately on PRs; the weekly build catches source-only integration
# drift without adding a full Nix rebuild to every Rust change.
# both supported Linux architectures. Flake and packaging/linux changes run
# immediately on PRs. The weekly build catches Cargo/source integration drift
# (for example a new native dependency that package.nix does not wrap) without
# a full Nix rebuild on every crate Cargo.toml bump.
#
# flake.lock pins nixpkgs exactly; update-flake-lock.yml advances it in a tested
# PR instead of allowing an unreviewed upstream channel to drift under builds.
Expand All @@ -14,12 +15,6 @@ on:
workflow_dispatch:
pull_request:
paths:
- "Cargo.lock"
- "Cargo.toml"
- "crates/**/Cargo.toml"
- "crates/**/build.rs"
- "design/icon/**"
- "docs/config.example.toml"
- "flake.nix"
- "flake.lock"
- "packaging/linux/package.nix"
Expand Down
Loading