Skip to content

deps: update rustls to 0.23.46 - #2048

Merged
Jaro-c merged 1 commit into
developfrom
deps/rustls-0.23.46
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

Jaro-c merged 1 commit into
developfrom
deps/rustls-0.23.46

Conversation

@Jaro-c

@Jaro-c Jaro-c commented Oct 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • The scheduled audit has failed on main and develop since 2026-10-15 because rustls 0.23.45 carries RUSTSEC-2026-0346, -0347, -0348 and -0349. All four are fixed in 0.23.46.
  • This is the lockfile bump and nothing else.

Changes

  • Cargo.lock: rustls 0.23.45 to 0.23.46 (cargo update -p rustls).

rustls reaches podup only through ureq, in the self-update download.

Test plan

  • cargo test --locked --all-features --workspace passes locally: 43 test targets, none failing
  • cargo deny check advisories reports ok, and cargo audit finds nothing, on this lockfile
  • The scheduled audit goes green on main and develop after this lands (main needs the release pull request)

I did not run fmt, clippy or the shell tests: the diff touches no source file.

Related issues

Refs #2047. I will close it once the scheduled audit is green on both branches.

The scheduled audit fails on main and develop because rustls 0.23.45
carries RUSTSEC-2026-0346, -0347, -0348 and -0349, all fixed in 0.23.46.
rustls reaches podup only through ureq, in the self-update download.
Cargo.lock is the only file that changes.

Signed-off-by: Jaro-c <75870284+Jaro-c@users.noreply.github.com>
@Jaro-c Jaro-c added prio:P1 High priority effort:S Small type:deps Dependency update area:ci Subsystem: ci labels Oct 16, 2026
@Jaro-c
Jaro-c added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 16, 2026
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 4f5ddb7 Oct 16, 2026
38 checks passed
@Jaro-c
Jaro-c deleted the deps/rustls-0.23.46 branch October 16, 2026 03:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:ci Subsystem: ci effort:S Small prio:P1 High priority type:deps Dependency update

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant