Skip to content

docs: record accessibility coverage and account photo behavior - #88

Merged
Eoic merged 2 commits into
developmentfrom
docs/accessibility-and-account-settings
Oct 24, 2026
Merged

Eoic merged 2 commits into
developmentfrom
docs/accessibility-and-account-settings

Conversation

@Eoic

@Eoic Eoic commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Document the implemented accessibility foundation and account profile behavior without claiming full-app WCAG conformance.

Refs #65 (NFR-5_2 remains open). Also documents the local guest-profile behavior supporting FR-1_4.

  • Target WCAG 2.2 AA with WCAG2ICT interpretation for native platforms.
  • Record tested criteria, journeys, evidence, compact-cover target exceptions, and pending native assistive-technology acceptance.
  • Explain device-wide accessibility preferences, reader isolation, offline name/photo persistence, and the private avatar upload contract.
  • Regenerate OpenAPI for authenticated avatar upload/download endpoints.

Validation

Warning-as-error Sphinx build, 23 documentation tooling tests, requirements export (84 work items), and OpenAPI consistency check passed. The audit records 1,927 passing client tests with 19 skipped, plus Chrome regressions and web compilation.

No versions or requirement completion statuses change. VoiceOver/TalkBack and broader app/EPUB/PDF accessibility remain pending.

Implementation: PapyrusReader/client#83 and PapyrusReader/server#42. Deploy the server before the client photo-upload feature.

The OpenAPI CI checkout is pinned to server commit 235fd051e2bf72283bcc6da4ecb2d1860b6ef332 so snapshot validation includes the new photo endpoints.

Refs #65. Keep full accessibility conformance open and document pending native acceptance.
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 24, 2026 01:50

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-24T01:51:05.219066Z a37aa20 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a37aa20a7f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread _static/openapi.json
@Eoic
Eoic merged commit 95bcda3 into development Oct 24, 2026
1 check passed
@Eoic
Eoic deleted the docs/accessibility-and-account-settings branch October 24, 2026 02:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants