refactor(oxfmt): use Rust formatters for jsdoc code fence

[leaysgur]

In addition to basic embedded (e.g. css-in-js), JSDoc also contain code fence as markdown.

This PR makes JSDoc code fence also formatted by oxc_formatter_xxx.

[leaysgur]

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

• refactor(formatter_css): fix up code and comments #23704
• refactor(formatter_graphql): fix up code and comments #23488
• test(oxfmt): add css + less + scss conformance #23435
• test(oxfmt): add gitlab as graphql conformance #23421
• fix(formatter_graphql): improve major prettier diffs #23419
• fix(formatter_css): improve major prettier diffs #23327
• feat(oxfmt,formatter_graphql)!: support draft syntax with removing prettier fallback #23326
• refactor(oxfmt): use unified embedded ir results #23325
• refactor(oxfmt): remove prettier fallback for css #23324
• refactor(formatter_css): update oxc_formatter_css to support sortTailwindcss option #23323
• refactor(oxfmt): use Rust formatters for jsdoc code fence #23322 👈 (View in Graphite)
• feat(oxfmt)!: format parser:css,less,scss files + css-in-js by oxc_formatter_css #23321
• feat(formatter_css): implement oxc_formatter_css #23320
• refactor(oxfmt): handle gql-in-js by oxc_formatter_graphql #23319
• feat(oxfmt)!: format parser:graphql files by oxc_formatter_graphql #23318
• feat(formatter_graphql): implement oxc_formatter_graphql #23317
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

• 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
• hotfix - for urgent changes, fast-track this PR to the front of the merge queue

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 13.64%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
✅ 58 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 9 skipped benchmarks¹

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	react_compiler[App.tsx]	42.3 ms	33.5 ms	+26.2%
⚡	Simulation	linter[RadixUIAdoptionSection.jsx]	10.1 ms	9 ms	+11.51%
⚡	Simulation	linter[App.tsx]	117.6 ms	107.8 ms	+9.12%
⚡	Simulation	react_compiler[RadixUIAdoptionSection.jsx]	9.1 ms	8.4 ms	+8.61%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing 06-11-refactor_oxfmt_use_rust_formatters_for_jsdoc_code_fence (020287d) with 06-11-feat_oxfmt_format_parser_css_less_scss_files_css-in-js_by_oxc_formatter_css (70d2e31)²}

Footnotes

1. 9 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on 06-11-feat_oxfmt_format_parser_css_less_scss_files_css-in-js_by_oxc_formatter_css (89645c1) during the generation of this report, so 648f514 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩